Je bent je ingevulde velden bij deze pagina aan het verwijderen. Ben je zeker dat je dit wilt doen?
You are erasing your filled-in fields on this page. Are you sure that is what you want?
Nieuwe Versie BeschikbaarNew Version Available
Er is een update van deze pagina. Als je update naar de meest recente versie, verlies je mogelijk je huidige antwoorden voor deze pagina. Hoe wil je verdergaan ?
There is an updated version of this page. If you update to the most recent version, then your current progress on this page will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
This section describes the analytic perspective of what makes a Rigid Translation.
The analytic view
Here is a video!
_
In analytic terms a rigid translation is when the relation that represents the function
is “changed universally’ in the following way: for any two and with , whatever is
being done to that pair of related points, the same thing is being done to
every single pair of related points. Moreover, this change must always be a
matter of adding or subtracting (in a particular way which we will discuss
below), not multiplying or dividing. This is easier to explain starting with an
example.
Consider the function . The points and are both on the graph of . Now if we apply
the rigid translation of “move up 2 and left 3” we can determine where these two
points go. In particular the point would go to and the point would go to . There
are two important things here to notice. The first is that both points moved in the
same way. They both went up 2 and left 3. In order to be a rigid translation, every
point on the graph would move the same way. The second is that the effect of
“moving up 2” was the same as adding two to the -value and the effect of
“moving left 3” was the same as subtracting three from the -value. Specifically,
the effects were done with adding and subtracting, not with multiplying or
dividing.
Knowing this means we can also determine what a rigid translation is from what it
does to a single point. Consider the same function as above, with the same point on
its graph. If we applied an unknown rigid translation, but we knew that the point
was translated to the point by that rigid translation, we can figure out what the
rigid translation was. Since went to we can see that the point moved left 1 point
(the -value went from 2 to 1) and down 5 (the -value went from 8 to 3).
Furthermore we can then apply this information to know that the point on the
original graph of must go left one and down five, so it would end up at
.
Notice how, in our example, we talked about the translations that applied to the
-value, and translations that applied to the -value separately. This separation is made
even more clear when we write the translation in functional notation. Let’s consider a
new function whose graph is;
We now want to apply the rigid translation that adds 4 to the and subtracts 5 from
the -value. We can write the result of this translation by first giving it a name, say ,
and defining it as a modification of the original . This turns out to be slightly more
tricky than one may think however.
Intuitively we might try to write our translation as follows; . After all, we wanted to
add to the and subtract from the , so this seems pretty reasonable. Let’s see what
the graph looks like.
A near miss! It appears that we got the vertical movement correct but it shifted the
wrong direction horizontally; it shifted left instead of right! The specifics on why this
horizontal shift is backwards are outside the scope of this course, but in this
specific context it suffices to remember that anything that effects the is the
opposite of what you’d expect. The mantra to remember is “Everything
about is backward”. Since you would expect that we want to add 4 to (to
move it to the right) what we actually want to do (in order to move it to
the right) is subtract 4. Thus the we actually want to use is whose graph
is;
In summary:
Writing this rigid translation using function notation (ie ) is the ‘functional
representation’. In general, a rigid translation of a function can be written by adding
(or subtracting) values from the functional argument (the part inside the
parentheses that follow the letter ), or by adding/subtracting values to the
overall result after applying . So, if you want to add some number to the
values and another number to the value, you can write the translation
as;
Notice that the inside has a subtraction sign in front of it. If you remember
it in this form then you can write the as you would expect (since the is
being subtracted not added which will take care of the ’opposite of what
you’d except’ part). Thus if you want to move the graph to the right 4 units,
you can use in the form, giving . In comparison if you wanted to move the
graph to the left by 4 you would do the same process. Since it’s to the left
you would think , so plugging that into the form above we have which is
correct.
Play with the following graph to see what happens as you change the parameters. Be
careful to observe the effect of the sign of the parameters in the example. Hopefully
using this interactive graph will help make clear how changing the values (rigidly)
translates the graph!
1 : In order to move a graph up or down we need to...
Add something to the
-value before the function evaluation in order to go up, and subtract something from
the -value before the function evaluation to go down.Subtract something from the
-value before the function evaluation in order to go up, and add something to
the -value before the function evaluation to go down.Add something
to the -value after the function evaluation in order to go up, and subtract
something from the -value after the function evaluation to go down.Subtract
something from the -value after the function evaluation in order to go up,
and add something to the -value after the function evaluation to go down.
2 : In order to move a graph left and right we need to...
Add something to
the -value before the function evaluation in order to go right, and subtract something
from the -value before the function evaluation to go left.Subtract something from
the -value before the function evaluation in order to go right, and add something to
the -value before the function evaluation to go left.Add something to
the -value after the function evaluation in order to go right, and subtract
something from the -value after the function evaluation to go left.Subtract
something from the -value after the function evaluation in order to go right,
and add something to the -value after the function evaluation to go left.