Exploring the usefulness and (mostly) non-usefulness of the quadratic formula
Generally, most students try to memorize the quadratic formula and ignore most of the other content on quadratics for the simple fact that the quadratic formula always gives the zeros of a quadratic whereas the other methods often are considerably more work (at least initially when learning them) and don’t always yield a useful answer. Nonetheless the quadratic formula is, by far, the least useful thing in this section for the simple fact that it only works on quadratic forms. In this class as well as calculus, we will typically have higher degree polynomials that we need to deal with, where the quadratic formula doesn’t apply.
Nonetheless, there are times when factoring is not a viable option. In these cases the quadratic formula is quite helpful, and thus you should think of this as a niche tool; a formula that has a very specific circumstance in which it can and should be used.
The quadratic formula is used to find the zeros of a quadratic. In particular this means it should be written as the full equation.
We shouldn’t take on faith that this equation works, instead we should show how we know for certain that this equation works, ie we should prove it.
To do this, recall that what we want are the zeros of , which is to say we want the values so that . So we want to solve:
As it happens, we can actually solve this, despite the remarkable level of generality by completing the square!
Notice that the equation makes no assumptions to suggest that the expression is non-negative. In fact, we can learn a lot thanks to the value of this expression, which also gets a special name; the discriminate.
In general, the discriminate is some sort of ‘distance’ between the vertex and the zeros of the function. Thus if the discriminate is positive (noting as well that a quadratic is symmetric across the vertex due to its ‘U’ shape), then it will have 2 (real-valued) zeros, one on each side of the vertex. If the discriminate is zero, then the quadratic will have the zeros at the vertex, meaning the there is one root twice. Finally, if the discriminate is negative, this means that the ‘distance’ between the vertex and zero is imaginary. This can only happen if there are no real-valued zeros. Since we know the roots exist by the fundamental theorem of algebra, they must be non-real valued (ie complex roots).
To put it succinctly:
