Je bent je ingevulde velden bij deze pagina aan het verwijderen. Ben je zeker dat je dit wilt doen?
You are erasing your filled-in fields on this page. Are you sure that is what you want?
Nieuwe Versie BeschikbaarNew Version Available
Er is een update van deze pagina. Als je update naar de meest recente versie, verlies je mogelijk je huidige antwoorden voor deze pagina. Hoe wil je verdergaan ?
There is an updated version of this page. If you update to the most recent version, then your current progress on this page will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
We discuss the circumstances that generate vertical asymptotes in rational functions.
You can watch a lecture video on this here!
_
We have encountered vertical asymptotes in the context of certain function types, but rational functions are special in that
they give a way to generate multiple vertical asymptotes. Moreover, their location and functional behavior around the vertical
asymptotes is not always the same. For this reason it warrants special attention. Unfortunately to properly study the nature of
domain restrictions one needs limits, which we won’t introduce until calculus. Despite this, there are some general guidelines we
can use that will work so long as the functions in the numerator and denominator are continuous functions (independently) near
the domain restrictions.
In general, assuming the continuity condition mentioned above, if an value resolves to zero in the denominator function, and
non-zero in the numerator function, then there is a vertical asymptote at that value. This is true even in a simplified version of the
rational function.
Let and and define . For what values does definitely have a vertical asymptote?
The first thing we want to do to solve this problem is to factor the numerator and denominator if possible. Doing so gets us .
This gives us domain restrictions of and .
At this point we could check both these values. If we do; we get the numerator and denominator are both for and we get the
numerator is and the denominator is when . From this we know that there is a vertical asymptote at . However, something of the
form “” it is called an indeterminate form and we don’t know what is happening at this value without doing further
work.
Ideally we hope to simplify the function to resolve our indeterminate issue. Since we were able to factor the top and
bottom, we can simplify the fraction down to . Now if we check we end up with , which is not “non-zero over
zero” and thus is not a vertical asymptote (indeed, it is a hole in the graph, which we will discuss in the next
section).
So, we can conclude that the only vertical asymptote that we know exists for sure is at .
Now lets consider a more complicated example.
Consider the function Here we need to do some work to try and factor the top and bottom, but it is still possible. In the case
of the bottom we can use rational root theorem and division to eventually factor it down to: . For the top we
can rewrite using rules of exponents to get . Substituting gives: So, the factored form becomes: So, the domain
restrictions for are (list from most negative to most positive): , ,, . Plugging these in to the numerator to see which
of these have the form “non-zero over zero” reveal that there are how many vertical asymptotes for ?
The takeaway is that, under certain continuity conditions near the domain restriction, if you try to evaluate a value and get
something of the form “non-zero over zero” that domain restriction represents a vertical asymptote. If you still get something of
the form “zero over zero” then it is indeterminate and you need better tools (limits) to determine what is happening. That leaves
one more situation; “something over non-zero”. In this last case, we have a hole at the domain restriction, and we discuss that
next.