Yes! Since the radicand has more than one term (separated with a plus or minus
sign) it is a type 2!
1 : Is the following radical a Type 1 or Type 2 Radical?
2 : Is the following radical a Type 1 or Type 2 Radical?
Yes! Since this has everything inside looking like it has already been factored (i.e.
each term is multiplying every other term) we have that this is a type 1 radical!
2.1 : Can you simplify this radical as it is currently written?
Since the original radical’s radicand is just one term (a.k.a. it appears “factored”
already) we can potentially simplify the radical... there is hope! However, this
also depends on the powers of the individual factors in the radicand, as
well as the power of the radical. Thus it is potentially something that can
be simplified further, but it may already be as simplified as it can get.
3 : Is the following radical a Type 1 or Type 2 Radical?
Yes! Since the radicand has more than one term (separated with a plus or minus
sign) it is a type 2!
4 : Is the following radical a Type 1 or Type 2 Radical?
Yes! Since this has everything inside looking like it has already been factored (i.e.
each term is multiplying every other term) we have that this is a type 1 radical!
4.1 : Can you simplify this radical as it is currently written?
Since the original radical’s radicand is just one term (a.k.a. it appears “factored”
already) we can potentially simplify the radical... there is hope! However, this
also depends on the powers of the individual factors in the radicand, as
well as the power of the radical. Thus it is potentially something that can
be simplified further, but it may already be as simplified as it can get.