Je bent je ingevulde velden bij deze pagina aan het verwijderen. Ben je zeker dat je dit wilt doen?
You are erasing your filled-in fields on this page. Are you sure that is what you want?
Nieuwe Versie BeschikbaarNew Version Available
Er is een update van deze pagina. Als je update naar de meest recente versie, verlies je mogelijk je huidige antwoorden voor deze pagina. Hoe wil je verdergaan ?
There is an updated version of this page. If you update to the most recent version, then your current progress on this page will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
This section views the square root function as an inverse function of a monomial. This is used to explain the dreaded symbol and
when to use (and not use) absolute values.
You can watch a video of this tile below; along with part two of how to simplify type one radicals.
_
In its essence, a square root is an attempt to solve the equation for some constant . In particular we want to be able to solve
something like . Hence the square root, and in particular the square root function was born.
But this immediately presented a problem. In our example of we can easily determine that both and work. So, if we use the
square root function to ‘undo’ the power on to get we now have a situation where the right hand side could be either or ... and in
fact it would need to be both if we want to make sure to get all the valid solutions. But a function can only output a single answer
hence we have a pretty big problem.
The first step to getting around this problem is to simply pick a default answer. Since positives are generally easier to deal with
than negatives, we decide by convention to have the square root return the positive valued answer. (This decision of a ‘default’
actually has a special name in math, called the “principle branch” of the square root. This isn’t something you would likely hear
again unless you take senior level math courses or math graduate courses though.) Thus even though the solutions to are bothand , the solution to is only . This subtle difference is absolutely imperative; and is the entire basis for the dreaded
symbol.
Now, you might object at this point by saying that this doesn’t actually get around our problem... and you’d be right! On the
one hand if we relax the requirement on the square root operation to give both positive and negative values, it is no longer a
function (which is all kinds of bad). On the other hand, if we only use the positive value result, we lose half of the ‘valid answers’;
which is also bad.
Luckily we have come up with a solution to this conundrum, although our solution introduces one of the most common sources
of confusion for precalc students, (In holding with Murphy’s law; each clever solution comes with an equally clever source of
confusion and error)the dreaded symbol.
To understand where the symbol comes from, we first want to recognize when our sign problem is actually a problem. In our
example , the sign problem is obviously an issue. In contrast however, the example only has one (real) solution; . Thus in this cube
root example there is no sign issue. So what’s the difference?
The key observation is that the even power obliterates any negative sign on the solution; hence and . In contrast the odd
power preserves negative signs; hence but . Thus this sign problem only occurs when we are dealing with even
root-values.
How does this effect functions, and specifically simplifying algebraic radicals?
In order to simplify algebraic roots then, we must treat even root values differently than odd root values. For even root values,
when we try to simplify a term by evaluating the root, we can represent the fact that the output is only the positive value by using
another function that only outputs positive values; the absolute value. For example; to evaluate something like we wouldn’t want
to write as it is not clear that we are ‘choosing’ the positive output. Instead we write . (Recall that the definition of i.e.
absolute value of , is for non-negative values of and for negative values of . We will discuss this more in the future topic on
piecewise functions.)
Using this notation however, we can more easily see that what we actually get when we simplify our example of is the
following:
=
=
=
That is to say, we are now trying to solve the equality , which makes it more clear that we should have as our solutions. Indeed, this is
really where the is coming from; from solving/simplifying a situation of the kind something (where the of the root and/or the
power can be replaced with any even number).
TLDR?
The short version of the symbol is the last paragraph of the above. Essentially the situation comes up when you simplify an even
root-value radical of something to an even power, which gives you an absolute value. In practice it is rare for someone to give you a
problem that isn’t simplified (at least in terms of even power vs even root). It is far more common that you have something being
raised to an even power and you the solver, introduce the even root-value radical as part of your solution method. Thus there is a
handy rule of thumb as follows; If you are the one to introduce the square (or other even root-value) root, always
consider the possibility of the . If you are given a square root (or other even root-value), then it only outputs a
positive.
The narrow bit of gray area is when you are given an even root of an even power (ie an unsimplified problem) because, even
though the output is positive by the definition of the root function, that doesn’t mean the absolute value that you get when you
simplify the even root with an even power won’t give you a style answer. So our rule of thumb listed above is merely that; a rule of
thumb, not an absolute rule. In general you should always be careful when simplifying a given radical to see if both positive
and negative answers would work. What you really want to look for is if the given (even) root represents an even
function.
Ok, even powers against even roots means I need an absolute value and , is that all?
Unsurprisingly, there is more we must consider. However, when it comes to type one radicals that is pretty much it. So
let’s consider the following example in an effort to see a (full) proper solution to an equation involving a type one
radical.
Find all real values of so that We start by observing that we can simplify the type one radical into the following form: Then,
for such that we want to solve the equation . Moving the over and factoring gives us: which gives us values of and as
(tentative) solutions. We have to be careful to check that both those values satisfy the initial requirement of (which they both
do).
Next we check for which means we want to solve the equation which, again moving the terms to one side gives us: which has
no real solutions.
Thus we have as our proposed solutions, and . If we plug in each into the original equation, we verify that each of them do, in
fact, satisfy the equation and we have our solutions.