Je bent je ingevulde velden bij deze pagina aan het verwijderen. Ben je zeker dat je dit wilt doen?
You are erasing your filled-in fields on this page. Are you sure that is what you want?
Nieuwe Versie BeschikbaarNew Version Available
Er is een update van deze pagina. Als je update naar de meest recente versie, verlies je mogelijk je huidige antwoorden voor deze pagina. Hoe wil je verdergaan ?
There is an updated version of this page. If you update to the most recent version, then your current progress on this page will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
This section describes how to perform the familiar operations from algebra
(eg add, subtract, multiply, and divide) on functions instead of numbers or
variables.
The Video!
_
The Text!
One of the key ideas of algebra (and mathematics in general) is to represent big
problems as relations between smaller problems. So far we’ve done this primarily
with variables; like when we say that the area of a patio is length times width we
write it succinctly as .
With functions however, we can take this one step further and discuss algebraic
combinations of functions. This may seem intimidating at first, but algebra with
functions behaves (almost) identically to algebra of variables. Take, for example, the
above formula we wrote; . But it’s not unreasonable to consider that and
could depend on something else, like money. If this is the case, we could
write that and are functions of the money () we spend, thus we would
write and (since and depend on ; that’s exactly what this notation is
saying). But is still the product of and , even though those are now both
functions of money, ie . This motivates our question about how we should
apply algebraic operations (like multiplication) to functions, rather than just
numbers.
In reality, most things can be viewed as functions (after all, most things
depend on something and that’s all we need for a mathematical relation!). The
important part here however is that (in most contexts) functions can also
be thought of as variables. Thus we can think of “adding”, “subtracting”,
“multiplying”, or “dividing” functions as being the same as doing it with
variables. In general terms, given functions and , we write the following
notation:
whenever
This is fancy notation (It turns out that these facts are actually highly
non-trivial, but the reason is quite deep and beyond the scope of this course. For
those that are interested you learn about why this is more complicated than it seems
in abstract algebra (senior level math-major course).) for saying: when
we want to add, subtract, multiply, or divide functions it is equivalent to
calculating each of the function values at the given value and applying the
desired operation to the result. (This kind of combination of functions is
called a “point-wise” definition, as it involves calculating things at a specific
domain point. Again, anything other than this kind of point-wise definition
is outside the scope of this course, but many other options exist and are
studied in other courses such as ‘advanced calculus’, ‘real analysis’ or ‘modern
analysis’.)
Algebra with functions...
Depends on the context of the functions, it may or may
not work as you would expect so you need to ask the problem-giver.Works largely as
you would expect; evaluating each function at the supplied value (or variable) and
then applying the given algebra operation as normal.Is a mystery that is beyond the
scope of this course.Works as expected, except that you don’t need to worry about
expanding or distributing signs or values.Only works for addition and subtraction;
other operations may or may not work correctly and should be avoided.