Je bent je ingevulde velden bij deze pagina aan het verwijderen. Ben je zeker dat je dit wilt doen?
You are erasing your filled-in fields on this page. Are you sure that is what you want?
Nieuwe Versie BeschikbaarNew Version Available
Er is een update van deze pagina. Als je update naar de meest recente versie, verlies je mogelijk je huidige antwoorden voor deze pagina. Hoe wil je verdergaan ?
There is an updated version of this page. If you update to the most recent version, then your current progress on this page will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
This section views the square root function as an inverse function of a monomial. This is used to explain the dreaded symbol and
when to use (and not use) absolute values.
So, we’ve seen that the solutions to are bothand , but in order to keep the process of taking a root as a function, the solution
to is only . This subtle difference is absolutely imperative, which we discuss in this segment.
Lecture Video
_
Text and details
So, we’ve decided to sacrifice half our solutions in order to keep our tool a function. That isn’t great - and indeed, we still need a
way to ensure we account for all solutions when we involve an even root. Luckily we have come up with a solution to this
conundrum, although our solution introduces one of the most common sources of confusion for precalc students, (In holding
with Murphy’s law; each clever solution comes with an equally clever source of confusion and error) the dreaded
symbol.
To understand where the symbol comes from, we first want to recognize when our sign problem is actually a problem. In our
example , the sign problem is obviously an issue. In contrast however, the example only has one (real) solution, . Thus in the cube
root example there is no sign issue. So what’s the difference?
The key observation is that the even power obliterates any negative sign on the solution; hence both and . In contrast the odd
power preserves negative signs; hence but , not . Thus this sign problem only occurs when we are dealing with even
root-values.
It turns out that we often skip some technical steps when we use radicals to cancel out powers, and those
skipped steps are where the confusion comes in. Recall that, when simplifying something like we didn’t just get ,
we got . Keeping this in mind, let’s very carefully write out all the steps of solving the equality , we can more
.
=
=
=
So, really, our solution isn’t , rather we need to solve the equality . But this representation makes it more clear that we should have as
our solutions. Indeed, this is really where the is coming from, from solving/simplifying a situation of the kind something (where
the can be replaced with any even number), since this generates an absolute value. Notice that, for the “something” being squared
inside the radical, this applies to anything that has a possible square root - meaning that even something like would
be possible, since we can rewrite this as . Essentially, the coefficients won’t matter since we can always take an
appropriate root to get an appropriate coefficient for inside the power, it’s really the power on the variable that we care
about.
TLDR?
The short version of the symbol is the last paragraph of the above. Essentially the symbol comes up when you simplify an even
root-value radical of something which gives you an absolute value. In practice it is rare for someone to give you a problem that
isn’t simplified (at least in terms of even power vs even root). It is far more common that you have something being raised to an
even power and you the solver, introduce the even root-value radical as part of your solution method (e.g. to get rid of the even
power and isolate the variable). Thus there is a handy rule of thumb as follows: If you are the one to introduce the square root (or
other even root-value), always put in the . If you are given a square root (or other even root-value), then it only outputs a
positive.
The narrow bit of gray area is when you are given an even root of an even power (ie an unsimplified problem) because, even
though the output is positive by the definition of the root function, that doesn’t mean the absolute value that you get when you
simplify the even root with an even power won’t give you a style answer. So our rule of thumb listed above is merely that - a rule
of thumb, not an absolute rule. In general you should always be careful when simplifying a given radical to see if both positive and
negative answers would work.
Ok, even powers against even roots means I need the , is that all?
Unsurprisingly, there is more we must consider. However, when it comes to simplifying radicals that is pretty much it. So let’s
consider the following example in an effort to see a (full) proper solution to an equation involving a radical. (Note that this
problem involves some techniques we haven’t explicitly covered yet (although they should be familiar to your already). We will still
cover these techniques - solving absolute values and inequalities for example, in later sections. We will also go over how to solve
equalities containing radicals in more depth and for harder problems in another section as well. This problem is
just intended to give a look at how the symbol can come up in a practical situation where you are solving an
equality.)
Find all real values of so that We start by observing that we can simplify the radical into the following form: Then, for such
that we want to solve the equation . Moving the over and factoring gives us: which gives us values of and as (tentative)
solutions. We have to be careful to check that both those values satisfy the initial requirement of (which they both
do).
Next we check for which means we want to solve the equation which, again moving the terms to one side gives us: which has
no real solutions.
Thus we have as our proposed solutions, and . If we plug in each into the original equation, we verify that each of them do, in
fact, satisfy the equation and we have our solutions.