Je bent je ingevulde velden bij deze pagina aan het verwijderen. Ben je zeker dat je dit wilt doen?
You are erasing your filled-in fields on this page. Are you sure that is what you want?
Nieuwe Versie BeschikbaarNew Version Available
Er is een update van deze pagina. Als je update naar de meest recente versie, verlies je mogelijk je huidige antwoorden voor deze pagina. Hoe wil je verdergaan ?
There is an updated version of this page. If you update to the most recent version, then your current progress on this page will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
We discuss the circumstances that generate holes in the domain of rational functions rather than vertical asymptotes.
In the last section we discussed how, under certain continuity conditions, we could determine if a domain restriction was a
vertical asymptote. Specifically if, when we attempt to evaluate the domain restriction we get something of the form “non-zero over
zero”. In this tile we explore what it means if we instead get some number over a non-zero value. That is, what happens if the
domain restriction is somehow “removed” by simplifying the function.
Recall from our section on discontinuities that a hole discontinuity is essentially a missing point along the graph of a function.
In fact, it is often described as a domain restriction that can be “removed” by adding a single point to the graph (and hence it’s
other common name; the “removable discontinuity”).
When you simplify a rational function and a previous domain restriction appears to be simplified away, that is exactly what is
happening. You are “filling in” the hole discontinuity. Indeed, the value you get when you evaluate the function at the discontinuity
is the -value of the hole. Consider a familiar example:
Let and and define .
Recall from the previous tile that we know is factorable to . We observed it has domain restrictions at and , and moreover we
showed that it has a vertical asymptote at .
However, simplifying yields . Thus, plugging in the domain restriction to the simplified form, we get . Notice that this is not
indeterminate and not undefined; it is a nice normal number (or, as nice as any real number anyway). Since this evaluates nicely,
we can conclude that this is indeed a hole discontinuity. Moreover, we can also conclude that the hole occurs at the coordinates .
The value being the domain restriction’s value, and the value being the number we got when we tried to evaluate the (simplified)
function at the domain restriction.
Again it is worth mentioning that the correct analytic way to determine the nature of discontinuities at domain restrictions involve
limits, but since we are restricting ourselves to continuous functions in the numerator and denominator, these
guidelines work to determine holes and vertical asymptotes in most contexts. Once you begin calculus and learn
limits you will have a much more rigorous mechanism and set of tools to determine behavior of functions near
discontinuities.
What are the coordinates for the hole in the function The coordinates of the hole are: