Visual introduction to One-sided Limits
One-sided limits
Let’s say we are trying to determine the limit of as approaches . It turns out considering values “near ” is a little too vague. Instead, it helps to break the neighborhood around into two regions, the values just to the left of (i.e. slightly less than or slightly more negative than ) and the values just to the right of (i.e. slightly larger than or slightly more positive than ). This is the concept of a one-sided limit!
A right limit, also called a limit “from the right” is the value being approached by -values approaching our point of interest (in the case above, ) from above (a.k.a. values to the right on the numberline).
We will introduce the formal notation in the next section, but for now let’s see some examples.
Recall the graph from our previous section:
From this setting we come to our definition of a limit.
- (a)
- (b)
- The limit as approaches is
- (c)
- (d)
- The limit as approaches is
- (e)
- (f)
- The limit as approaches is
- (g)
- (h)
- The limit as approaches is
Limits might not exist
Limits might not exist. Let’s see how this happens.
Explain why the limit as approaches of does not exist.
If this limit exists, then we should be able to look sufficiently close, but not at, , and see that is approaching some number. Let’s look closer at the portion of our graph near our point:
If we allow x values on the left of 2 to get closer and closer to 2, we see that . However, if we allow the values of on the right of 2 to get closer and closer to 2...
We see that for all these values just to the right. We cannot find a single number that approaches as approaches 2! In essence, since the left limit () and the right limit () are not going to the same place, the limit at cannot exist, because we can’t get a single value for our definition.
You may have noticed that in our example above, the function is also discontinuous at that point. It turns out this is true in general! We will explore the relationship between continuity and limits a little later (including finally giving a formal definition of continuity, rather than our intuitive definition we’ve had since before precalculus!) but for now we state the following useful result:
You can intuitively think of a function being continuous at a point, as meaning that there isn’t a discontinuity at that point. You can review types of discontinuities and what they mean here (You should open the link in a new tab!).
The actual justification/proof for the above theorem will be covered when we dive deeper into continuity, but this result will allow us to investigate many useful examples in the meantime.