Je bent je ingevulde velden bij deze pagina aan het verwijderen. Ben je zeker dat je dit wilt doen?
You are erasing your filled-in fields on this page. Are you sure that is what you want?
Nieuwe Versie BeschikbaarNew Version Available
Er is een update van deze pagina. Als je update naar de meest recente versie, verlies je mogelijk je huidige antwoorden voor deze pagina. Hoe wil je verdergaan ?
There is an updated version of this page. If you update to the most recent version, then your current progress on this page will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Two young mathematicians investigate the arithmetic of large and small numbers.
Check out this dialogue between two calculus students (based on a true story):
Devyn
Hey Riley, I’m having a little trouble with this limit
Riley
Well, just plug in and see what you get, right?
Devyn
I tried that, here’s what I got...
Riley
Hm, so that... equals 1 right? I mean, anything divided by itself must be 1?
Devyn
I was thinking the same thing. Initially. But then I tried simplifying stuff first and look what happened.
Riley
Ok... so the answer is 4? Or is it 1? It can’t be both right?
Devyn
Right, that’s why I’m stuck.
Riley
Well, we originally thought it was 1 because it was “a number divided by itself.” But that number was zero, and
dividing by zero is usually where things go wrong in math.
Devyn
Good point. Come to think of it, I can’t just plug in the limit value because that only works when the function is
continuous at that point. And I can’t evaluate the top and bottom separately like that, because that limit law only
works when the bottom isn’t zero. Crap, I really messed that one up, the limit must be then. Thanks!
Devyn
...
Devyn
Also, uh, don’t mention this conversation to anybody ok?