Je bent je ingevulde velden bij deze pagina aan het verwijderen. Ben je zeker dat je dit wilt doen?
You are erasing your filled-in fields on this page. Are you sure that is what you want?
Nieuwe Versie BeschikbaarNew Version Available
Er is een update van deze pagina. Als je update naar de meest recente versie, verlies je mogelijk je huidige antwoorden voor deze pagina. Hoe wil je verdergaan ?
There is an updated version of this page. If you update to the most recent version, then your current progress on this page will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
We give some hints and tips on how to see and predict where a U-Sub might help.
One of the most difficult aspects of the -substitution is knowing what to substitute. This can be exacerbated by the fact that
instructors, by virtue of having taught -subs for years and practiced them hundreds or even thousands of times, always seem to
know the exactly perfect substitution to make right away. But for a student learning this technique for the first time, this is a fairly
unreasonable goal. In this segment we will discuss how someone new to this technique might figure out how solve complicated
integrals that require elaborate -substitutions.
Video Lecture
_
Text with Additional Details
The best thing to remember is that you don’t need to do everything in one substitution. Instructors often perform one massive
substitution because they have the experience to see the exact (often crazy/elaborate) substitution that perfectly converts the
integrand into something easy to compute, and it saves time when presenting problems in a classroom. But there
is absolutely no mathematical reason you need to do everything in a single substitution. Consider the following
example:
The best way to tackle a complicated expression like this, is one piece at a time. Look for something that looks like
it might be a viable substitution and go with that. Don’t worry about catching everything, or about trying to
make sure the result after the substitution is something you can integrate right away. Do a substitution, then
revisit the result as if it is a new integral and see if there is an antiderivative, or another substitution that makes
sense.
Let’s go through our example from start to finish. First we might notice that a part of the exponent might make a good
substitution because there is a multiplier on the outside. So let’s start with that - let , then , and so . Now we can substitute into
our original integral to get:
But, now that we look at the new exponent , that isn’t really doing anything other than making things difficult. So let’s do a
substitution to get rid of that. Thus we can do another substitution; . Then and we now have:
Ok, now the exponent on is better. But looking at it further, that is inside the square root, and also multiplying the
outside. We could probably do a substitution for that, so let’s try and see what happens. So, , and . This gives
us;
Again we notice here that the part of doesn’t really do much here, so we can try another substitution to get rid of it. Let’s try .
Then and we have;
Finally! We can do this integral! Specifically . Now we can unravel all our substitutions:
.
.
.
.
So, our end result is .
Now, it’s true we could have done the entire thing in one step if we happened to see the substitution as our first
substitution - and if you managed to see that, awesome! But most students, especially those first learning and using
-substitutions, would not have seen that. Importantly, a student may have seen some better substitutions along the
way in the above example (we purposefully did a lot of substitutions for demonstration), but the point is that
although doing more complicated substitutions might make the work faster, it won’t make the answer any more
correct!
Until you get the experience and confidence to see and try more complex -substitutions, rest assured that it is not only acceptable,
but a good idea, to do multiple substitutions to handle more complicated cases, rather than spending a lot of time trying
to figure out the “perfect” substitution. Moreover, attempting to do a large or complicated substitution often
leads to more computational errors, whereas multiple simpler substitutions usually results in fewer computational
errors.
1 : When doing substitutions, especially when first learning the -substitution method for integration, it is best to...
Do as
few substitutions as possible to reduce the number of steps and compute stuff faster.Go out of your way to do
as many substitutions as possible to make them smaller.Do the substitutions you see, even if they are small,
and use as many (or as few) as you are comfortable with and need. Don’t go out of your way trying to use more
or fewer substitutions just because you think you are suppose to.Look up the best substitution to use online.
The big takeaway from this is that often those demonstrating -substitutions for students have years of experience and have done
this kind of substitution hundreds or thousands of times. As a result, it’s natural for them to do complicated large substitutions
all at once, because for them they aren’t especially difficult to see or do. But this gives the false impression to
students that they are suppose to do substitutions all at once - searching for the “perfect” single substitution. This is
not only untrue, but generally a really bad idea, leading to more computational errors and frustration for the
student. Remember that it is not just ok, but actually a good idea, to do substitutions piecemeal - do whatever
substitution you see that might make the problem simpler, one after another, until you can get to something you can
integrate!