Some infinite series can be compared to geometric series.

As mathematicians, we are explorers. We explore the implications of seemingly simple quantitative facts.
Consider the infinite series Let be the sequence of terms of this series. When is large, is pretty close to halfdouble of . The effect of the numerator increasing by is dwarfed by the effect of the denominator being doubled. We can formalize this by looking at the ratio of consecutive terms: When we choose a very large whole number , for , and so we get the following approximations: In other words, the tail of the sequence beginning with is “approximately” a geometric series with ratio .
Does a geometric series with ratio converge or diverge?
converge diverge
Given your answer above, do you suspect that the original sum converges or diverges?
converge diverge

The above exploration motivates the following theorem. The proof of this theorem is slightly beyond the scope of the course.

Note that this is easy to remember if you just use the following heuristic.

If the ratio test gives a limit of , then the series is like a geometric series of ratio .

The case of is an “edge” case, and can go either way. Now that you have the basic idea, we give examples showing:

  • The ratio test indicating convergence.
  • The ratio test indicating divergence.
  • The ratio test being inconclusive, but the series actually converges.
  • The ratio test being inconclusive, but the series actually diverges.

It is important that examples illustrating the final two behaviors exist, because it shows that the ratio test really is inconclusive in the case .