You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?
Updated Version Available
There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Mathematical Expression Editor
We discuss the basics of parametric curves.
The idea of parametric equations
Think back to when you first learned how to graph a function. I’m pretty sure you
used a so-called “T-chart,” and if , I bet it looked something like this: With a
parametric plot, both and are now functions of a third parameter, we’ll call it ,
often thought of as time: If , then there isn’t much difference between a parametric
plot and a regular plot. On the other hand, with parametric functions, we
can generate plots that fail the vertical line test! Check out this graph of
as runs from to :
Do the parametric equations
as runs from to define a function of ?
No, because the graph does not pass the
vertical line test.Yes, it is a function of , because for each input , there is exactly
one output value, an ordered pair.
For the graph of a circle, is not a function of . However, it can be a function of that
maps
where the domain is and the elements of the range consist of ordered pairs.
Famous parametric equations
We’ll discuss some basic parametric equations.
Circles
The standard form for a circle centered at a point with radius is given by One
problem with the standard form for a circle is that it is somewhat difficult to find
points on the circle. A parametric equation representing a circle solves this
problem.
Give a parametric equation representing the circle and explain why your answer
is correct.
This is the circle of radius centered at the point . Here we set
as runs from to . To see that our answer is correct, we can “plug”
it back into the implicit equation for the circle. Write with me:
by the Pythagorean identity. Since our functions satisfy the form of the circle, our
solution is correct.
One way to think about parametric formulas for circles is to imagine
as “drawing” the unit circle as changes. Make a table showing how the circle is being
plotted as runs from to :
Is the circle “drawn” in a clockwise or counterclockwise fashion?
clockwisecounterclockwise
One day while trying to graph a unit circle, you accidentally write down
What happens now? Do you still get a circle? How is this different from what we did
in the previous question?
you still plot a unit circle in a counterclockwise
fashion, with the same starting and ending pointsyou plot a unit circle
but in a clockwise fashion, with the same starting and ending pointsyou
still plot a unit circle in a counterclockwise fashion, but the starting and
ending points are differentyou plot a unit circle but in a clockwise fashion,
but the starting and ending points are differentthis no longer plots a
circle
In mathematics, when parameterizing closed curves (like circles), the convention is to
draw them in a “counterclockwise” direction. This is called the positive
orientation.
If you parameterize your closed curves in a clockwise direction, you may find your
“answers” are off by a factor of .
What should and be to parameterize the circle in a counterclockwise fashion, with
corresponding to ?
Lines
Suppose you want a parametric equation for a line that goes through the point with
a certain direction:
where the is imagined as starting at and going to the point :
So to understand the direction of the arrow above, we need to move it back to the
origin.
In the graph above, what is the direction of the arrow? The direction is given by .
At this point we can give a very useful representation for a line:
where the is imagined as starting at and going to the point . Another way of writing
this is
Suppose you have the parametric formula for a line What is ?
We’re at the starting point!
What is ?
We’ve moved exactly the “direction” from the point!
Other equations and other plots
One thing that can be confusing about parametric plots is that there can be multiple
representations of the same plot:
Which of the following parametric equations draw the circle ?
and for and
for and for and for and for and for
Which of the following parametric equations draw the line ?
and for and for and for and for and for and for
Parametric plots allow us to make some pretty crazy plots.
Can you give a parametric formula for this cool spiral that starts at the origin and
runs to ?
One important class of parametric curves are Lissajous figures. These are curves of
the form
Here is a plot of a Lissajous curve where , , and
These figures come up a lot in electrical engineering. Do yourself a favor and play
around with Lissajous figures for differing values of , and .
Converting to parametric equations
If you are given it is really easy to convert this to a parametric function, just write
Can you use the technique described immediately above to express as a parametric
function?
Converting from parametric equations
On the other hand, if you are given a parametric function, to express as
function of can be much more difficult. Here are the basic strategies to try:
Solve for .
Solve for a function of .
Use a trigonometric identity.
In each case the process that we are using is called elimination of a parameter.
We’ll give several examples of how one actually eliminates a parameter.
Solving for the variable
In the first example, we’ll solve for .
Let
Eliminate a parameter to express this curve purely in terms of and .
Here we will
solve for . Since it is easier, we will solve for in this equation:
Now plug this into , and write
Solving for a common function
In our next example we’ll solve for a function of that is common to both and
.
Let
Eliminate a parameter to express this curve purely in terms of and .
Here we will
solve for a function of . Write
Now we can rewrite as
Now we see that
Solving for related functions
In our final example, we will use a trigonometric identity.
Let
Eliminate a parameter to express this curve purely in terms of and .
The basic idea
is to try an use the Pythagorean identity: So first isolate cosine and sine, and square
the equations. With we have
and with we have
Plugging this back into the Pythagorean identity, we see: