You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?
Updated Version Available
There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Mathematical Expression Editor
We investigate what continuity means for functions of several variables.
This section investigates what it means for functions to be “continuous.” We begin
with a series of definitions. We are used to “open intervals” such as , which represents
the set of all such that , and “closed intervals” such as , which represents the set of
all such that . We need analogous definitions for open and closed sets in
We give these definitions in general, for when one is working in :
An open ball in centered at with radius is the set of all vectors such
that . In an open ball is often called an open disk.
A point in is an interior point of if there is an open ball centered at
that contains only points in . We can write this in symbols as
Let be a set of points in . A point in is a boundary point of if all
open balls centered at contain both points in and points not in .
A set is open if every point in is an interior point.
A set is closed if it contains all of its boundary points.
A set is bounded if there is an open ball centered at the origin of radius
such that A set that is not bounded is unbounded.
Determine if the domain of the function is open, closed, or neither, and if it is
bounded.
We’ve already found the domain of this function to be This is the region
bounded by the ellipse . Since the region includes the boundary (indicated by the use
of “”), the set containsdoes not contain all of its boundary points and hence is closed. The region is boundedunbounded as a disk of radius , centered at the origin, contains .
Determine if the domain of is open, closed, or neither, and if it is bounded.
As we
cannot divide by , we find the domain to be In other words, the domain is the set of
all points not on the line . For your viewing pleasure, we have included a graph:
Note how we can draw an open disk around any point in the domain that lies entirely
inside the domain, and also note how the only boundary points of the domain are the
points on the line . We conclude the domain is an open seta closed setneither
open nor closed set . Moreover, the set is boundedunbounded .
Limits
On to the definition of a limit!
Suppose that , intuitively,
the limit of as approaches is ,
written if the value of can be made as close as one wishes to for all sufficiently
close, but not equal to, .
Suppose that , , and . What do we write in this case for ?
Suppose that , , and . What do we write in this case for ?
Compute:
To compute this limit, we proceed by factoring. Write with me,
Continuity
Now we will use our definition of a limit to define continuity.
Let be defined on an open disk centered at .
is continuous at , if
is continuous on an open disk if is continuous at all points in .
To really use this definition, we need limit laws which in some sense are really
continuity laws.
Limit Laws Let and be functions of several variables, , and are real numbers,
where
Constant Law
.
Identity Law
.
Sum/Difference Law
.
Scalar Multiple Law
.
Product Law
.
Quotient Law
, if .
True or false: If and are continuous functions on an open disk , then is continuous
on .
TrueFalse
True or false: If and are continuous functions on an open disk , then is continuous
on .
TrueFalse
The function may or may not be continuous, it depends on whether . If , then not
continuous at that point.
Composition Limit Law Let be a continuous function on an interval . Let be a
function whose range is contained in (or equal to) , Then
Composition of Composite Functions Let be continuous on an open disk , where the
range of on is , and let be a single variable function that is continuous on . Then is
continuous on .
Show that the function is continuous for all points in .
Let Since is not
actually used in the function, and polynomials are continuousare not
continuous , we conclude is continuous everywhere. A similar statement can be made about
Setting we obtain a continuous function from . Since sine is continuousis not
continuous for all real values, the composition of sine with is continuous. Hence, is continuous
everywhere. We finish by presenting you with a plot of :
Let Is continuous at ? Is continuous everywhere?
To determine if is continuous at ,
we need to compare Applying the definition of , we see that We now consider the
limit Substituting for and in returns the indeterminate form , so we need to do
more work to evaluate this limit.
Consider two related limits:
The first limit does not contain , and since is continuous,
The second limit does not contain . But we know
Finally, we know that we can combine these two limits so that
We have found that , so is continuous at .
A similar analysis shows that is continuous at all points in . As long as , we can
evaluate the limit directly; when , a similar analysis shows that the limit is . Thus we
can say that is continuous everywhere. We finish by presenting you with a plot of :
When limits don’t exist
When dealing with functions of a single variable we often considered one-sided limits
and stated if and only if That is, the limit is if and only if approaches when
approaches from either direction.
In when there are infinite paths from which might approach . Now we have a fact,
if and only if along every path.
If it is possible to arrive at different limiting values by
approaching along different paths, the limit does not exist.
This is analogous to the left and right hand limits of single variable functions not
being equal, implying that the limit does not exist. Our theorems tell us that we can
evaluate most limits quite simply, without worrying about paths. When
indeterminate forms arise, the limit may or may not exist. If it does exist, it can be
difficult to prove this as we need to show the same limiting value is obtained
regardless of the path chosen. The case where the limit does not exist is often
easier to deal with, for we can often pick two paths along which the limit is
different.
Show does not exist by finding the limits along the lines .
Evaluating along
the lines means replace all ’s with and evaluating the resulting limit:
While the limit exists for each choice of , we get a different limit for each choice of .
That is, along different lines we get differing limiting values, meaning the limit does
not exist. We finish by presenting you with a plot of :
Show does not exist by finding the limit along the path .
Let We
will show that does not exist by finding the limit along the path .
First, however, let’s try the same trick that worked before and see
what happens. Consider the limits found along the lines as done above.
By applying L’Hôpital’s Rule, we can show this limit is except when , that is, along
the line . This line is not in the domain of , so we have found the following fact:
along every line in the domain of , Now consider the limit along the path :
Now apply L’Hôpital’s Rule twice to find a limit is of the form . Hence the limit does
not exist. Step back and consider what we have just discovered.
Along any line in the domain of the , the limit is .
However, along the path , which lies in the domain of the for all , the
limit does not exist.
Since the limit is not the same along every path to , we say does not exist. We finish
by presenting you with a plot of :