You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?
Updated Version Available
There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Mathematical Expression Editor
We learn a new technique, called substitution, to help us solve problems involving
integration.
Computing antiderivatives is not as easy as computing derivatives. One
issue is that the chain rule can be difficult to “undo.” We have a general
method called “integration by substitution” that will somewhat help with this
difficulty. The idea is this, we know from the chain rule that so if we conisder
This “transformation” is worth stating explicity:
Integral Substitution Formula If is differentiable on the interval and is
differentiable on the interval , then
Three similar techinques
There are several different ways to think about substitution. The first
is directly using the formula
Compute:
A little thought reveals that
if is the derivative of some function, then it must have come from an
application of the chain rule. Set , so , and now it must be that . Now we see
Notice the change of endpoints in the first equality! We obtained the new integrands
by the computations
We will usually solve these problems in a slightly different way. Let’s do the same
example again, this time we will think in terms of differentials.
Compute:
Here we will set . Then , where we are thinking in
terms of differentials. So we can solve for to get . We then see that
At this point, we can continue as we did before and write
Finally, sometimes we simply want to deal with the antiderivative on its own, we’ll
repeat the example one more time demonstrating this.
Compute:
Here we start as we did before, setting . Now , again
thinking in terms of differentials. Now we see that Hence So
More examples
With some experience, it is (usually) not too hard to see what to substitute as . We
will work through the following examples in the same way that we did for Example
??. Let’s see another example.
Compute:
Here we set , so . Then
Notice that this example is an indefinite integral and not a definite integral, meaning
that there are no limits of integration. So we do not need to worry about changing
the endpoints of the integral. However, we do need to back-substitute into our
answer, so that our final answer is a function of . Recalling that , we have our final
answer
If substitution works to solve an integral (and that is not always the case!), a
common trick to find what to substitute for is to locate the “ugly” part of
the function being integrated. We then substitute for the “inside” of this
ugly part. While this technique is certainly not rigorous, it can prove to
be very helpful. This is especially true for students new to the technique
of substitution. The next two problems are really good examples of this
philosophy.
Compute:
The “ugly” part of the function being integrated is . The
“inside” of this term is then . So a good possibility is to try Then and so
Compute:
Here the “ugly” part here is . So we substitute for the inside: Then
Notice that
Then we substitute back into the original integral and solve:
To summarize, if we suspect that a given function is the derivative of another via the
chain rule, we let denote a likely candidate for the inner function, then translate the
given function so that it is written entirely in terms of , with no remaining in the
expression. If we can integrate this new function of , then the antiderivative of the
original function is obtained by replacing by the equivalent expression in
.